Tuesday, 3 December 2013

Review TechRadar: Phone and communications news 12-03-2013

TechRadar: Phone and communications news
TechRadar AU latest feeds 
Want to learn how to design a logo?

This beginner logo design course will take you step by step through the process from start to finish.
From our sponsors
Updated: HTC One Mini gets banned in the UK as Nokia wins patent fight
Dec 3rd 2013, 15:13, by Hugh Langley

Updated: HTC One Mini gets banned in the UK as Nokia wins patent fight

HTC is truly feeling the burn of the patent war right now, as a judge has ruled that the HTC One Mini infringes some Nokia-owned patents and has banned the device from being sold in the UK.

HTC will not be allowed to sell the Mini any more starting from December 6.

Perhaps even worse, the HTC One flagship is also at risk of seeing a ban, though the judge acknowledged that this would cause "considerable" damage and has given HTC time to appeal.

HTC has agreed to cease imports of its devices to the UK until the next hearing.

Bye bye baby

Nokia had already won an injunction that meant HTC had to alter its microphone inside the One, but this is a significant step further.

HTC told us: "HTC is pleased by the decision of the High Court of England and Wales to stay an injunction against certain chipsets, including those in our flagship HTC One, pending the outcome of our appeal against the validity and infringement of Nokia's EP 0 998 024 patent."

It also said that it is working with its chip suppliers to "explore alternative solutions", and added, "Rest assured that our award winning HTC One handset will be available as usual."

Get a last good look at all this HTC One Mini you can't have, Brits


    






Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Lite set to debut at MWC 2014?
Dec 3rd 2013, 11:36, by James Rogerson

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Lite set to debut at MWC 2014?

Samsung loves to milk a product for all it's worth, just look at all the Samsung Galaxy S4 spin-offs like the Galaxy S4 Mini, Galaxy S4 Active and Galaxy S4 Zoom for proof of that.

With the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 being the latest big thing from the Korean company it's seemed like it would only be a matter of time before that too would get in on the spin-off action. In fact back in July there were even rumors of there being four different versions of the handset.

So it's no surprise to hear that at least one of those versions is a reality, as the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Lite is apparently in the works.

An insider for SamMobile confirmed that not only does the handset exist, but that it will be officially announced at MWC 2014, before hitting the street in February or March.

Same size, lower specs?

Unfortunately there's no word on specs yet, but according to SamMobile it will be available in black or white and is likely to have either a 5.49 or 5.7-inch display.

Given the name it will presumably be cheaper and less powerful than the Galaxy Note 3 and assuming it's the budget version of the Note 3 that we heard about in July it's likely to have an LCD screen and an 8MP camera.

Not the most exciting of handsets then, especially since by March it may have the Samsung Galaxy S5 for company, but if the price is right it could certainly sell - although word of the Galaxy Grand 2 and Galaxy Grand 2 Lite may just confuse the market even more. Perhaps the Korean firm just needs to hold fire a bit.


    






Blip: Darth Vader posts selfie, we find his lack of sepia filter disturbing
Dec 3rd 2013, 10:25, by Hugh Langley

Blip: Darth Vader posts selfie, we find his lack of sepia filter disturbing

George Lucas never let us see the Empire's fun side, but that doesn't mean those guys don't like to cut loose once in a while.

Sith Lord Darth Vader definitely likes to snap the occasional fun pic. In fact, his selfie was the first picture to be uploaded onto the new Star Wars Instagram account in some early Episode VII hype-building.

So now we know - it was actually Darth who shot first. Perhaps we'll have more of our Star Wars-related questions answered soon. Like, where do Stormtroopers go drinking after work? Which sector has the best parties? And does the Death Star have a canteen?

More blips!

Our blips are impressive. Most impressive.


    






Foxtel to start selling broadband and phone plans in 2014
Dec 3rd 2013, 05:58, by Farrha Khan

Foxtel to start selling broadband and phone plans in 2014

If you've found it annoying to have to pay separate bills for your phone line, home internet and Foxtel over the years, things may start looking up for you next year.

Foxtel has signed a deal with Telstra, one of its parent companies, which will see the pay TV company reselling broadband and fixed-line telephone plans bundled with its many pay TV options beginning sometime late next year.

Foxtel's "triple play" plans will connect users through Telstra's ADSL network and the National Broadband Network.

Blurred TV lines

Just as analog TV becomes a thing of the past, Foxtel moving into the "triple play" ISP market signifies a new chapter for the pay TV company in Australia.

No pricing details have been announced, nor how the bundles will work, though we imagine it would make Foxtel either a very attractive or more restrictive option.

On the plus side, the company has said that it would be looking at discounts and unmetered use for bundles, but also simpler billing and customer care.

Though Foxtel has launched internet-only services like Foxtel Go and Presto that don't lock you in a contract, signing on for a bundle may end up locking you in anyway.

In any case, we'll be interested to see how pricing stacks up once it's announced.


    






Sydney says a final goodbye to analog TV
Dec 3rd 2013, 02:24, by Farrha Khan

Sydney says a final goodbye to analog TV

We're nearing the end of an era - at 9am today, Sydneysiders were permanently switched to digital-only TV.

Analog TV signals were switched off in the region in the largest digital switch-over to take place in Australia to date, involving more than 1.7 million households in Sydney and surrounding areas.

The final digital switchover in Australia is scheduled to take place on December 10, with Melbourne and remote and central eastern Australian regions left to switch of Australias's remaining analog TV signals.

If your region hasn't been switched over yet, make sure you have either a set-top box, a digital TV or a digital recorder connected to your old analog TV - though we can't imagine that any of you aren't ready for it.

In the strange circumstance that you aren't, you can always utilise the Australian government's Household Assistance Scheme and Satellite Subsidy Scheme to help you get "digital ready".

Welcome to the digital age

The country-wide switchover began on June 2010 in Mildurra Victoria.

The government auctioned off most of the analog signal spectrum that opened up as part of the Digital Divendend, with telcos buying up the 700MHz spectrum to expand their 4G network.

As more of the spectrum will be opened up after the final analog TV switch-off, it is likely that the government will once again hold an auction for it.

With more and more users relying on mobile internet, it'll be interesting to see if telcos will again buy up the spectrum to further develop their 4G networks.


    






It's down with memes, up with 'high quality content' in News Feed update
Dec 3rd 2013, 01:29, by Michelle Fitzsimmons

It's down with memes, up with 'high quality content' in News Feed update

Imagine a Facebook News Feed not populated by dumb memes (and not because you just don't get them) but by links to articles dealing with current events and issues.

Got the picture? Good, because it's about to become very real.

Facebook is updating the News Feed to push out more "high quality content," a move in response to surveys that show people prefer links to articles about current events to "the latest meme."

Users will especially notice the change on mobile as Facebook aims to become the go-to source of information about what's happening in the world, and not just a peddler of third-party tripe.

Other News Feed changes

Facebook also said that when users click on an article link, they may occasionally be shown up to three related articles directly below the News Feed post.

In addition to minimizing memes and pushing out more reputable content, the company has a scheme to generate more engagement around articles.

Facebook revealed it will republish articles users may have already seem to the top of the News Feed whenever a friend comments on the thread.

The thought alone is annoying enough, but Facebook noted its testing has found that "doing this in moderation for just a small number of stories can lead to more conversations between people and their friends on all types of content."

We're dubious this will work the way Facebook envisions, but we don't really have a choice now, do we?


    






In Depth: Nexus 5 vs Moto X: which is better?
Dec 2nd 2013, 22:41, by Marc Flores

In Depth: Nexus 5 vs Moto X: which is better?

It's a good time to buy Android phones. With the likes of the Nexus 5, Moto X and HTC One, it's really hard to go wrong. The question is, which phone should you buy?

We're going to compare two of our favorite Android devices - the Nexus 5 and Moto X - because if we had to spend our own cash on an Android smartphone today, it would boil down to those two devices.

Although the phones have their differences, they're also alike in some ways. This might make the decision-making process harder, especially when they're both great devices.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

The Nexus 5 is a solid machine with some of the best specs you can find on an Android phone today. It has a sharp, 5-inch 1080p display, Snapdragon 800 with a 2.26GHz CPU, Adreno 330, 2GB RAM and all for a starting price of just $350 unlocked. That is incredible.

On the other hand, the Moto X has a rich 4.7-inch -720p AMOLED display, excellent curvature and customizable design, active notifications and Touchless Control. The latter allows you to speak commands to your phone even if it's asleep, which means the microphone is always on.

Let's take a look at the big features and see how they compare between the two devices.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Display

The Nexus 5 has a 5-inch, 1920 x 1080 IPS LCD display, which gives us a density of 445 PPI. Compared to other smartphones, its colors and contrast tend to look more washed out, and the display doesn't get nearly as bright as the HTC One or iPhone 5S, for example.

However, whites look white without having too much of a bluish or cool tint. And the display is very sharp, which makes watching movies and looking at photos a real pleasure.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

The Moto X has a 4.7-inch 1280 x 720 AMOLED display, which offers deep blacks, rich colors and contrast and generally warmer hues. It has a density of 316 PPI, so it looks sharp enough when you're holding it at normal viewing distances.

Which display is better? Well, it all becomes a matter of preference. The Moto X's AMOLED display is very rich when it comes to color and contrast, and it also draws less power, which helps the Moto X with its great battery life.

However, we also like the Nexus 5's larger, razor-sharp display. Without another smartphone to compare it to, the colors and brightness are just fine. It's only when you compare it directly with the Moto X or HTC One that you begin to notice its slightly washed out colors and contrast.

It's a toss-up between the two, but many seem to prefer the Moto X's display even though it's not as large or sharp as the Nexus 5's screen.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Camera

At the moment, and until Google fixes the camera on the Nexus 5, we can easily give this one to the Moto X.

The Moto X has a 10MP rear camera, while the Nexus 5 has an 8MP shooter. Of course, megapixel count isn't everything, but it's the way each camera performs along with the native camera interface.

We found that the Moto X had a much easier time focusing in situations where the Nexus 5 struggled to find focus. In fact, the Nexus 5 would sometimes take seconds to focus even in bright, high-contrast scenes.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

Moreover, there is a considerable amount of shutter lag on the Nexus 5's camera, whereas the Moto X was quick to start up and take shots and go from shot to shot.

Motorola also updated its camera software recently to allow you to drag its focus indicator to select your focus and metering point.

The Nexus 5's native camera software can be frustrating and confusing, especially for first-time Nexus users. There aren't many settings available, and they're hidden or buried in certain actions that first-time Nexus or Android owners might not find.

One thing we do like about the Nexus 5 camera is PhotoSphere, or the ability to take 360-degree panorama images. The stitching could use some improvement, and generally it's more of a user issue than a software one, but it's a neat trick to have.

When it comes to image quality, we will give the edge to the Nexus 5 despite its huge shortcomings in the actual shooting department. Images just seem less noisy and not oversharpened on the Nexus 5.

Another thing the Nexus 5 does better than the Moto X is HDR, or what's called HDR+ on the Nexus 5. It does a good job of retaining details in highlights and in shadows without making them look too cartoony, or giving a halo effect around edges. The Moto X tends to overdo the HDR effect, especially in scenes where the dark and light areas are extreme.

In the end, getting the shot, and preferably in a timely manner, is what matters to us. The Moto X does that a little better than the Nexus 5, and the X's camera software is a little more manageable, too.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Battery life

Initial reviews of the Nexus 5 weren't so forgiving when it came to assessing its battery performance. However, we've found that over time, the Nexus 5's batter isn't bad at all, and it's very much comparable to other high-end Android devices like the HTC One.

However, it still doesn't quite keep up with the Moto X, whose battery can easily last an entire day and then some depending on your usage.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

If we had to estimate just how much more life, on average, the Moto X gets over the Nexus 5 in terms of juice, we'd say that the Moto X can get up to 4-8 hours more on a single charge than the Nexus 5.

At the low end, it might not sound like a huge difference, but those few hours between getting home from work and going to sleep is big - especially if you're going to spend those hours being out on the town.

If you're considering either phone and battery life is a dealbreaker for you, we'd highly recommend getting the Moto X.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Performance

In day to day use, performance differences between the two devices are surprisingly negligible. One would imagine that the Nexus 5, with a 2.26 GHz Snapdragon 800, would easily blaze by the Moto X's 1.7 GHz Snapdragon S4 Pro.

Numbers and specs don't tell the whole story, as we've learned over time. There were some cases when the Moto X was just slightly faster than the Nexus 5, and vice versa. In the end, it's a toss up between the two for most uses.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

Similarities in performance can also be attributed to the device's displays, where the Moto X has fewer pixels to push than the Nexus 5.

When we opened and ran apps side by side, they were both roughly the same. In situations where the Moto X was faster, we were slightly surprised. A few examples are within Chrome and YouTube: in Chrome, some web pages loaded up faster than on the Moto X, and in YouTube some videos were ready to play on the Moto X, too.

The Nexus 5 was definitely faster in some cases, like when we we loaded up Asphalt 8 and played through one round of the game.

One would think that the Nexus 5 would have the clear edge in performance because of its spec sheet, but real-life daily use tells another story. Between the two, it's honestly a toss-up.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Perks and features

One of the nice things about both phones is having voice control options. For the Moto X, you simply have to train it to recognize your voice via Touchless Control. Its microphone is always on, so whenever you say "OK Google Now," the phone will be ready for your next command.

The downside is that it will require you to unlock your phone if you have a passcode PIN or pattern, which we always recommend, so its usefulness is hampered.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

The Nexus 5 will recognize the phrase "OK Google" when you're already in Google Now, and from there you can give it similar commands to ones you'd make for the Moto X.

When it comes to being touchless, we would give the Moto X the edge for its ability to hear your voice even when the phone isn't active. It also has a feature that knows when you're driving, so you can have your messages read to you.

Another huge feature, at least for us, is the Moto X's Active Notifications. Without having to touch your phone, the Moto X will display your notifications if it detects sound or movement, so you can glance at the time and all of your missed notifications without having to unlock your phone.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

You can also attend to certain notifications right away, and the difference is simply between swiping up or down from the lock screen.

It might sound like Active Notifications are for the lazy, but it certainly helps manage distractions. When the Nexus 5 buzzes, you have to reach for your phone and unlock it to see whether you have to attend to something or not.

With the Moto X, when you get a notification, they all remain on your Active Notifications display, so you can decide when to get to them.

For the Nexus 5, having Google Now always on and just a swipe to the left is convenient if you like Google Now. You'll always have real-time info when it comes to weather, your calendar events, travel and transit times and options, sports scores and more. Of course, the Moto X has Google Now, too, but the Nexus 5 gets a dedicated home screen for it.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X: Which should you buy?

After comparing a few of the big differences and features between the two devices, it's time to decide which one to buy.

Of course, this is only a decision you can make for yourself. We're hoping that we've provided you with enough info to know which one is right for you.

The Nexus 5 will likely be one step ahead when it comes to getting Android updates from Google. Its specs make it future proof, the display is gorgeous, and it's the cheapest high-end smartphone you can buy unlocked and off contract.

Nexus 5 vs. Moto X

The Moto X has a little more soul, something other powerful smartphones like the LG G2 lacks, and its physical design seems a little more human-friendly. Its UI still makes it feel like a Google-y phone, and its battery life is excellent.

You can also customize the Moto X to your liking, with many color, name and engraving options. The Nexus 5, on the other hand, comes in only black or white.

We're always left feeling unsatisfied when we read or write comparisons that end in, "It's so hard to decide, they're both great," but that's exactly how we're going to end this. You really can't go wrong with either device, and both have their perks and faults.

In the end, what matters to you is what's going to guide your decision. Need great battery life? Get the Moto X. Want a big display? Get the Nexus 5. That can go on and on, so good luck with your purchase decision and try not to sweat it so much!


    






Microsoft, Nokia deal gets thumbs up from US government
Dec 2nd 2013, 19:53, by Michelle Fitzsimmons

Microsoft, Nokia deal gets thumbs up from US government

All Microsoft probably wants for Christmas is rapid regulatory approval (alongside stellar Surface and Xbox One sales), and so far at least some of its Xmas wishes are coming true.

The US Department of Justice has approved the company's plan to purchase Nokia's device and services division, moving the $7.2 billion deal closer to completion. Straight conversions put value the deal at about £4.4 billion, AU$7.9 billion.

The DOJ actually bestowed its blessing on Black Friday, and Microsoft expressed its pleasure that the department "cleared the deal unconditionally."

The next major hurdle for the acquisition lays in wait at the EU, which is expected to make a decision by December 4. However, the European regulators can lengthen their deadline by up to 10 business days if it needs more time to mull potential Microsoft concessions.

No-No-Nokia, No-No-Nokia, Nokia all the way

Nokia shareholders overwhelmingly approved Microsoft's purchase plans last month, and with authorities in nations from the US to India giving the A-OK, the deal is all but a lock.

Of course, the EU may find the Microsoft's proposal violates antitrust policies, which would stick a Lumia 1520-sized wrench in the buyout. No conditions are expected, but the EU could be feeling particularly cheeky that day.

Even after the seemingly inevitable happens and Redmond and Espoo can finally ride off into the high-gloss yellow sunset together, questions still remain just how Microsoft will meld Nokia's products with its own.

Microsoft will have a sturdy consumer device manufacturing machine in its arsenal, but whether the Lumia name sticks around and Ashas are kept out of the dust bin are unknowns neither side is willing to answer quite yet.


    






In Depth: MWC 2014: what to expect
Dec 2nd 2013, 16:31, by Gary Cutlack

In Depth: MWC 2014: what to expect

Think the world can't possibly accommodate any more smartphones? You think wrong.

Despite the fact that our planet currently contains more unique designs of mobile phone than there are visually identifiable snowflake forms, we're about to be hit by a deluge of new mobiles. Make a date in your diary for February 24, 2014, when the plastic-formers and die-casters of the world will unleash their next-generation models at Mobile World Congress 2014.

MWC is the annual mobile tech event where pretty much every major phone hardware company shows off its new flagship models for the following spring/summer contract renewal market.

MWC 2014 no-shows

There have been a few exceptions, though. Samsung opted to demonstrate its Galaxy S4 at a separate event in 2013, while Sony tried to get a head start on the competition by unveiling its Xperia Z at January's CES tech show last year instead.

The MWC 2013 event was all about larger displays and quad-core hardware. This year will be about even bigger displays and, as we've already seen from the LG G Flex and Samsung Galaxy Round, there may be some interesting new tech on display in the form of bendable screens and yet more takes on the emerging smartwatch trend.

All of the major manufacturers featured below are down to attend (with the exception of BlackBerry and Apple) and, thanks to the recent Big Bag explosion of Android, previously modest handset makers like ZTE and Huawei look set to make the most noise with rafts of cheaper phones that still deliver a decent experience.

Nokia at MWC 2014

Windows Phone has had a pretty triumphant few months, with Microsoft's partnership with Nokia finally bearing fruit and WP's market share slowly increasing. IDC's recent numbers put it at 3.6% (Q3 2013), compared to 2% in Q3 2012 - a healthy 156% increase.

Windows Phone 8.1

People seem to be remembering that they used to like Nokia, and although the company has released the likes of the Lumia 1520 and Lumia 2520 tablet in recent weeks, there may be more to come. Recently, the Lumia 1820 and Lumia 2020 have been rumored, with the latter likely to be a new flagship 8-inch tablet.

We should also see the first hardware set to launch with the Windows Phone 8.1 Blue software pre-loaded at MWC 2014, an OS update that's expected to massively overhaul WP's notification system, boost the multitasking options and incorporate a voice-based personal assistant feature. Because everyone's got to have a Siri function, even if no one ever uses it.

Samsung at MWC 2014

Rumor has it that Samsung is again saving its Galaxy S5 announcement for a separate event, just like it did last year with the bizarre Galaxy S4 launch in New York. But that doesn't mean its booth will be any less heaving with new stuff

Samsung Galaxy S5

The Samsung Galaxy Note 12.2 mega-tablet is expected to be on show, plus there are likely to be KitKat versions of older handsets and updates of the Galaxy Note 8.0 to thrill nerds with too. There's also the chance of something extremely random like the Galaxy Gear 2 or perhaps even a hint of a phone running the Tizen OS that Samsung's been working on.

HTC at MWC 2014

HTC used to be Mobile World Congress banker, using the event to launch its newest models. In 2012 it gave us the HTC One X and One S, but in 2013 even HTC turned its back on the Barcelona show, launching its flagship HTC One ahead of time.

HTC One

In 2014 we expect HTC to launch a new flagship, thought to be currently going under the development name of HTC M8, which rumors suggest will be a device with a 5-inch 1080p display, quad-core Snapdragon 800 processor and Android 4.4 as its launch OS beneath an updated HTC Sense 6.0 user interface.

This sounds rather like... most phones nowadays. Still, if HTC can whack in the same sort of top-drawer speakers and camera as the HTC One, we'll be buying it and eBaying last year's model, as ever.

Will we see it launch at MWC? We're not so sure, as the Taiwanese firm looks to be mirroring the likes of Apple and Samsung with its own standalone event.

Huawei at MWC 2014

The Chinese phone maker is rumored to be preparing an update to the decent Huawei Ascend P6 and is, rather unsurprisingly, sticking the fashionable letter "S" on the end of the model name to signify that it's newer and better.

The Ascend P6S is said to arrive running a full octa-core processor supplied by MediaTek, which ought to get the core enthusiasts happy.

Huawei Ascend P6

ZTE at MWC 2014

ZTE polarized phone fans at MWC 2013, revealing the flashy 5.7-inch Grand Memo and the weird little ZTE Open, running the Firefox OS.

ZTE Grand Memo

It's recently announced the small and affordable Nubia Z5S and Z5S mini models, but rumors suggest it has a secret higher tier on the way - a 6.44-inch ZTE Nubia Z7 could be its forthcoming "phablet" flagship and the one it wants to shout about at MWC 2014

ZTE is also said to be planning a smartwatch for release in 2014, but then so is everyone, so that's hardly news.

LG at MWC 2014

LG is back on the smartphone A-list thanks to its successes with the excellent Nexus 4 and the more than adequate Nexus 5, both of which have encouraged people to consider its own-brand efforts like the LG G2 more than they perhaps might have done before Google salvaged its reputation.

LG G2

Last year LG revealed the Optimus G Pro and the updated affordable L series range at MWC 2013, so we expect a similar mixture of a high-end banger and a few cheaper hangers-on to appear in 2014.

There are two key LG rumors that may be resolved at MWC (or sooner). LG is said to be Google's hardware partner for an updated Nexus 10 tablet, plus it's also recently registered the trademark "Glasstic" -- which may be some sort of Google Glass competitor.

Sony at MWC 2014

With the Xperia Z1 only just launched, we wouldn't forgive Sony for taking it easy and just bringing along a couple of those for people to play on and some t-shirts to give away. Surely it can't be preparing to release another flagship smartphone already.

Sony Xperia Z1

One thing we are expecting to see is something along the lines of a Sony Xperia Z1S, a smaller version of 2013's Z1 model. Taking your current hero device and making it a bit smaller and cheaper is the cool thing to do.

Google at MWC 2014

Google is on the list of MWC 2014 exhibitors, although it's likely to spend most of its time and square footage pushing the general Android ethos and giving away stickers than actually revealing any new Nexus hardware.

That said, we're expecting a new Nexus 10 to appear any day now, so if that one doesn't pop before Christmas, perhaps it could be saved as an MWC headline-stealer to detract from the stacks of enhanced tablets that Samsung is bound to show up with.


    






Updated: 4G and LTE: everything you need to know
Dec 2nd 2013, 11:22, by James Rogerson

Updated: 4G and LTE: everything you need to know

With the exception of EE, existing mobile networks have until recently been relying purely on 3G/UMTS technology, which is now 10 years old and struggling to cope with the needs of today's data hungry users.

4G/LTE (Fourth Generation / Long Term Evolution) is the next stage in mobile network development and provides users with much faster data speeds than 3G is able to.

EE has been testing the waters with 4G since October 2012, and until just a few months ago had the market to itself in the UK.

While EE were able to leverage some of its existing spectrum in the 1800MHz band, the other networks had to wait till a spectrum auction held by Ofcom in February 2013 before they could even start preparing for a 4G launch.

However both O2 and Vodafone have launched 4G networks of their own, so EE is finally starting to see some competition, while Three is set to launch its own 4G network in December too, and is set to aggressively undercut the competition in terms of price.

So here's what you need to know if you're thinking of getting your hands on one of those fancy-Dan superfast 4G handsets everyone keeps going on about these days.

What are the differences between 4G frequency bands?

4G can be a confusing beast, particularly when there are three different frequency bands in use in the UK alone.

The 2.6GHz band is one of the two frequencies that were auctioned off by Ofcom in February. It has a greater data capacity than the other two bands so it can deal with loads of people connecting at once, but it doesn't fare so well over long distances, making it ideal for cities and other compact, densely populated areas but not so good for rural locations.

The 800MHz band is the other spectrum that was sold off in February. It was used to provide analogue terrestrial TV, but has been freed up since the big Digital switchover.

While it doesn't provide the same data capacity as the 2.6GHz band, the 800MHz frequency can easily travel over long distances and will be used to provide broadband speeds to rural areas where telephone exchanges can't reach.

Being low frequency it's also better at penetrating walls than the 2.6GHz or 1800MHz bands, so it will provide an improved signal when indoors.

The 1800MHz band is used by EE and once Three launches a 4G network of its own in December it will be using it too, thanks to purchasing a chunk of it from EE.

However, as part of the deal to get the spectrum off the brand formed from the merger of T-Mobile and Orange, Three had to agree not to launch 4G on the spectrum before October 2013, which is the main reason for it delaying its deployment until later in the year.

The 1800MHz band strikes a balance between coverage and capacity (falling between the extremes of the 2.6GHz and 800MHz bands) which makes it a good 'middle-ground' for getting 4G around the country.

Ofcom's 4G spectrum auction

The 4G spectrum auction held by Ofcom at the beginning of the year saw winning bids from O2 (Telefónica UK), Vodafone, Three (Hutchison Whampoa) and of course EE. Interestingly BT also came away with a piece of the pie through its subsidiary Niche Spectrum Ventures.

Remember, more MHz means a better connection, so the more 'x GHz' of spectrum, the more widespread and robust a network can be.

Vodafone spent the most at the auction- a whopping £790,761,000 and came away with 2 x 10MHz of 800MHz spectrum, 1 x 20MHz of 2.6GHz spectrum and a further 1 x 25MHz of 2.6GHz spectrum.

EE spent £588,876,000 and secured 2 x 5MHz of 800MHz spectrum and 2 x 35MHz of 2.6GHz spectrum, which is less spectrum overall than Vodafone has.

Don't forget that EE can also call upon the 1800MHz spectrum that it's been using over the last year though.

O2 spent £550,000,000 on 2 x 10MHz of 800MHz spectrum. The company completely neglected the 2.6GHz band which may hurt its inner city performance, but with its extensive network of Wi-Fi hotspots in cities the bubbly brand thinks it will be OK without it – although it will be interesting to see how receptive consumers are to the idea.

Three spent £225,000,000 on 2 x 5MHz of 800MHz spectrum. Like O2, the company passed on the 2.6GHz band, however Three will also have access to some 1800MHz spectrum, as noted above.

BT was something of a surprise bidder and secured 2 x 15MHz of 2.6GHz and 1 x 20MHz of 2.6GHz spectrum - though it doesn't look like the telecoms giant is going to launch a new mobile network. Instead the spectrum is likely to be used to boost and complement its existing broadband services as well as providing behind-the-scenes wireless support for the mobile industry.

EE's position

4G arrived in the UK on 30th October 2012 courtesy of a joint venture between Orange and T-Mobile named Everything Everywhere, or 'EE' for short.

EE was granted permission by Ofcom to use part of its existing 3G bandwidth for 4G, which is why it got a head start on everybody else in October 2012. As you can imagine, rival networks were somewhat unhappy about this decision, but part of the deal for EE to get this head start was that it had to sell off a chunk of its 1800MHz spectrum.

This chunk was promptly snapped up by Three, though despite getting a hold of 4G spectrum before O2 or Vodafone, Three is the last network to launch a 4G service, which is part of the sale deal with EE.

For almost a year EE was the only provider of 4G services in the UK and it's made the most of that head start as its 4G network is currently available in well over 100 UK towns and cities.

If you don't live in one of those 4G-imbued areas you can still buy one of EE's 4G handsets and use the 4G services in any of the towns and cities which do have coverage, but you'll have to wait a bit longer to get 4G where you live.

Tariffs used to be fairly expensive but in the face of competition they've become a little more reasonable – for example for £18.99 per month you can get 500MB of data, unlimited texts and 1000 minutes on a 24 month contract with a handset.

That puts EE in a very competitive position and EE has the advantage of far wider 4G coverage than any of the other UK networks.

What's more, EE has access to a huge amount of 4G spectrum and is the only network with access to all three of the 4G spectrum bands that are in use in the UK, making it the best prepared for data demands of the future.

EE has also begun improving its 4G network in certain locations, leading to 'double speed' 4G being available in a number of towns and cities and the company has even started trialling 300Mbps LTE-Advanced in London's Tech City. This all means that it's got a substantial technological advantage over O2, Vodafone and Three, but it hopefully won't be long until the rest have caught up.

EE hasn't neglected the extras either, as customers who take out a plan with unlimited minutes can also get access to the Deezer music streaming service, EE's Mobile TV or a games add-on which lets you download and keep two mobile games every 30 days.

O2's position

O2 finally launched its 4G network on August 29, although as yet the network can't really match up to EE's coverage, with its 4G service limited to London, Leeds, Bradford, Birmingham, Newcastle, Liverpool, Glasgow, Nottingham, Leicester, Coventry, Sheffield, Manchester and Edinburgh, which amounts to indoor UK population coverage of around 28%.

Though it can be hard to directly compare each networks 4G pricing, O2's starting prices are a little higher than EE's. A phone on a 24 month O2 Refresh contract will cost you at least £32 per month (£22 for the airtime and £10 for the handset), though that is with 1GB of 4G data, unlimited texts and unlimited minutes, which is more than you get on EE's cheapest tariff.

That said, in a bid to get early customers O2 has got a few temporary deals that are rather more compelling. Before February 28 2014, customers who opt for a £27 per month O2 Refresh airtime contract will receive 5GB of data instead of the standard 3GB for the life of the contract.

Similarly customers who take out a £32 per month airtime contract will get 8GB of data instead of 5GB for the duration of the contract.

Early deals aside O2 doesn't have the coverage to back up its prices so in the short term it seems like a tough sell. On top of that, the fact that O2 doesn't have access to the 2.6GHz frequency may result in it not having the data capacity to adequately serve 4G to cities once customers become more data hungry.

Another problem O2 faces is that the iPhone 5 isn't compatible with its network, but anyone who purchased an iPhone 5 from O2 between the September 21 2012 and March 31 2013 is eligible for an early upgrade deal, wherein O2 will knock off 25% of the remaining line rental and give you up to £280 for your old handset (depending on model and condition), making it much more affordable to upgrade to a phone that can get 4G.

Of course the fact that the iPhone 5 is incompatible is less of an issue now that the iPhone 5S and iPhone 5C are out, but it could be a sticking point for anyone still using the 5.

On the plus side O2 4G customers will have access to the latest hits with O2 Music, exclusive sports videos with Priority Sports and will be able to download some free games through O2 Games.

Vodafone's position

Vodafone also launched its 4G network on August 29, seemingly just to steal some of O2's thunder as the network was previously talking about launching later. It also has a site-sharing deal with the effervescent provider, so that's likely to have played a big part in making the August 29 switch-on more efficient.

Initially Vodafone's 4G signal was only available in London, but now it's been extended to Birmingham, Coventry, Glasgow, Leicester, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Sheffield and by the end of the 2013 the network aims to have brought it to Bradford, Edinburgh, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Newcastle. That's thirteen cities in all, which is the same number as O2 currently provides 4G to, though still a long way short of EE's coverage.

However Vodafone does have one advantage and that's pricing, as many of Vodafone's 4G tariffs are cheaper than O2 or EE. For example for £34 a month Vodafone will give you 2GB of data, unlimited calls and unlimited texts on a 24-month contract with a handset.

That's more data than either O2 or EE are offering with their entry level tariffs and if you sign up for a contract before January 31 2014 you'll get an extra 4GB of monthly data.

You won't be left high and dry if you're already a Vodafone customer either, as assuming you have a 4G-ready handset then for £5 extra a month you can switch to a 4G tariff - which will also double your data allowance.

Better yet, Vodafone 4G customers who take up a 24 month contract with a handset will also get access to either Spotify Premium (which usually costs £9.99 a month) or Sky Sports Mobile TV (usual price £4.99 a month) for no extra charge.

Whichever service you choose will be free for anything from six months to the full two years of the contract, depending on your tariff.

Much like O2, Vodafone is unable to provide 4G to the iPhone 5, but customers who purchased an iPhone 5 from Vodafone between the September 12 2012 and June 30 2013 will be able to return their handset to a Vodafone store and have 75% of their remaining line charges taken off to minimize the cost of an upgrade.

Similar deals are also available for those with a Samsung Galaxy S3 or Samsung Galaxy Note 2.

With sizable chunks of both the 800MHz and the 2.6GHz band, Vodafone should have the capacity to deliver a fast, reliable 4G connection to customers in both urban and rural locations.

Three's position

Three has finally announced it will be rolling out its 4G network in December 2013, which is a bit later than the Big Three. However, it will have an ace up its sleeve: no additional cost for 4G.

If you already have a 4G handset and a Three SIM then 4G speeds won't cost you any extra - all you'll have to do is install a software update from the network to activate it.

Those on monthly plans with all you can eat data won't see any caps imposed on their data limits either, meaning those running on the One Plan for £15 per month will get unlimited 4G data, and nigh-on unlimited calls and texts (providing they already have a 4G-enabled phone) which will massively undercut Three's rivals.

London, Manchester and Birmingham will be the first cities to get the 4G network, with the switch on set to "accelerate" in January bringing 4G access to over 1.5 million customers in the new year.

By the end of 2014, Three intends to have 4G coverage in 50 cities across the UK, and nearly the whole country covered by the superfast connection by the end of the following year.

This is thanks to the numerical network managing to nab some of the 800MHz spectrum to deploy 4G speeds to the rural parts of the British Isles, as mentioned above.

That combination of low prices and large data allowances could be enough to topple the scales in Three's favour and may, we hope, force the other networks to further lower their prices.

Getting 4G at Three's prices will mean waiting just a little bit longer, but in the meantime there's always the network's Ultrafast service, which is substantially faster than standard 3G.

However, long term things don't quite so rosy for the network, as with only a small amount of 800MHz and 1800MHz spectrum it may struggle to keep up with its customers data needs.

4G coverage: When will the whole of the UK have it?

Although all of the networks should have 4G services by the end of 2013, they will of course focus their efforts on major cities first in an effort to service the most users.

Ofcom's targets say that 4G must reach 98% of the population and 95% of the country by the end of 2017, but EE claims that it will cover 98% of the country by the end of 2014 and already covers 60% of the UK population, while O2 and Vodafone are both aiming to cover 98% of the country by the end of 2015, so UK-wide 4G coverage may be closer than you think.

EE is also upgrading its 3G network to DC-HSPA in an effort to improve speeds when 4G services aren't available, while customers of Three can fall back on the networks Ultrafast service.

Are the new 4G phones any good?

The 4G phones currently available in the UK are basically just LTE-equipped versions of current top-end 3G phones, such as the iPhone 5S, Samsung Galaxy S4, and HTC One, along with a few mid range handsets such as the HTC One Mini and Nokia Lumia 820.

One of the advantages to being late to the 4G party is that we're spared the rubbish "first try" handsets that we suffered back when 3G came out, so don't be shy to try the new 4G phones.

4G handsets are available on every network, though if, as in Three's case, the network hasn't launched its 4G service yet, you'll be limited to 3G speeds for the time being.

Do the 4G versions of the iPad 4, iPad Mini and iPhone 5 work in the UK?

They do! The iPad 4, iPad mini and iPhone 5 all work on the 1800MHz frequency band used by EE. However they aren't compatible with the 800MHz or 2.6GHz bands that O2 and Vodafone use, so you'll only be able to enjoy 4G speeds on the previous generation of iDevices if you get one on EE or wait for Three to roll out 4G.

A few months ago this was a major issue, but now the iPhone 5S, iPhone 5C, iPad Air and iPad mini 2 have all arrived and they're all theoretically compatible with every 4G network in the UK, though when it comes to the iPad Air and iPad mini 2 only EE and Vodafone actually offer them with 4G right now.

None of the older iPhones or iPads work with 4G on any UK network, including the still-not-discontinued-yet iPad 2, so even when buying through EE or Three you'll have to shell out for the more recent of Apple's offerings.

What are the 4G download speeds?

EE boasts speeds typically five times faster than current 3G networks, though on several occasions we found it to be ten or more times faster than a comparable 3G handset in the same area.

In use it just makes everything feel much snappier and ensures tasks like checking image-laden emails and browsing complex web pages is a breeze.

EE claims average download speeds of 12-15Mbps and typical maximum speeds of 40Mbps, with upload speeds averaging around 5-6Mbps with a typical maximum of 15Mbps.

EE has also started rolling out 'double speed' 4G in select locations. So far it's available in 20 cities and, according to EE, average download speeds in those locations are 24-30Mbps, while the maximum speed is 60Mbps. Average upload speeds are said to be 11Mbps.

EE has achieved this by making network improvements which allow customers to use 2 x 20MHz of spectrum, where before they would have been using 2 x 10MHz of spectrum – essentially a bigger (virtual) pipe allowing a faster rush of data to enter your phone.

EE has even started experimenting with 300Mbps LTE-Advanced, though so far that's only available to select companies in London's Tech City.

Neither O2 or Vodafone can come close to that yet, but both networks standard 4G speeds are similar to EE's, coming in at around five times faster than 3G.

Why is 4G so fast?

4G's impressive speed increase is achieved with the use of OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Divison Multiplexing), a transmission technology used by the likes of ADSL, Wi-Fi, DVB-T, DVB-H and DAB.

Not only does it reduce latency (the amount of time taken to buffer and connect to webpages), but it also minimises interference and is able to cram greater amounts of data into the same slice of radio bandwidth.

Simply put, this enables 4G/LTE phones and tablets to stream video and play online games like never before, largely because 4G has been designed primarily as a data network, rather than a voice one and it uses the same TCP/IP protocols that underpin the internet.

The upshot for you is that the data is 'flatter', as in it's easier for the networks to stream, so should theoretically be cheaper. Whether those cost savings are ever passed on remains to be seen – it's not cheap to roll out 4G, especially at this rate of deployment across the UK.

It's possible that further increases in speed could be achieved with MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) technology, which uses multiple antennas on transmitters and receivers like 802.11n Wi-Fi equipment.

Nokia has reportedly achieved 173Mbps from 4G with a 2x2 MIMO configuration (two antennas on both the transmitter and receiver), so a 4x4 arrangement could potentially offer as much as 326.4Mbps, although this isn't something we need to think about right now… although perhaps we'll see these speeds on the iPhone 10?

LTE-A and the future of 4G

The UK may only just be fully embracing 4G but some parts of the world are already looking to the next generation of high speed mobile data. That next step is LTE-A (the 'A' is for 'advanced', fact fans).

Essentially it works by increasing the number of antennas in use as detailed above, alongside 'carrier aggregation' which allows a device to combine multiple 4G signals or even multiple different frequencies, rather than just using one at a time as standard 4G does.

In theory LTE-A can deliver far greater data speeds than the 4G of today. In fact it could potentially reach real world speeds of well over 160 Mbps, which is comparable to a 20MB home broadband connection.

LTE-A won't work on 4G-ready phones as they'll specifically need an LTE-A chip in them, however there are already a few LTE-A compatible handsets out.

For example there's an LTE-A version of the Samsung Galaxy S4 which is available in some parts of the world, but if you're considering importing it, don't, because other than a very small scale trial by EE none of our networks currently support LTE-A.

The UK will certainly get in on the act one day, in fact EE is talking about making an LTE-A network commercially available sometime in 2014. But the technology is still in its infancy and we've only just got normal LTE, so we've probably got a while to wait before it's widely available.


    

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 in line for 20MP camera boost?
Dec 2nd 2013, 10:35, by Thomas Thorn

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 in line for 20MP camera boost?

Samsung may be hunting the compact camera market to extinction if news that it is developing a 20MP camera sensor is to be believed.

ET News reports that it isn't due to be released until the latter half of 2014, so we're not going to see it sat behind the Samsung Galaxy S5. Current rumours suggest that the S5 will come with only 16MP.

A Q3 launch of the camera module would put it more in line with the annual refresh of the Samsung Galaxy Note series, so we'd expect the mooted sensor to potentially land in the Galaxy Note 4.

A way to go

Both the Galaxy S4 and Galaxy Note 3 sport a 13MP camera, and when compared to the likes of the 20.7MP Sony Xperia Z1 and 41MP Nokia Lumia 1020, Samsung is still some way off key competition.

There's a chance that this camera may worm its way into the Galaxy S6 in early 2015 and potentially even a Samsung Galaxy S5 Zoom midway though 2014 - the Galaxy S4 Zoom does, after all, already have a 16MP camera.

Other manufacturers are pushing camera tech in new ways, with the HTC One's UltraPixels and LG G2's OIS system, and we're still waiting for Samsung to offering up something new.


    

Samsung Galaxy Grand Lite may arrive in time for MWC 2014
Dec 2nd 2013, 09:56, by Hugh Langley

Samsung Galaxy Grand Lite may arrive in time for MWC 2014

Samsung has just announced the Galaxy Grand 2, but it's got plans to cover yet another price point with the Galaxy Grand Lite.

According to SamMobile the Galaxy Grand Lite, as it's being referred to right now, is on its way and could be unveiled at MWC in February 2014.

The phone packs a 5-inch WVGA screen, 1.2GHz quad-core processor, 1GB of RAM, 8GB of storage and a microSD slot to bulk that up.

The rear camera will be a 5MP deal, while there'll also be a front-facing VGA snapper and a 2100mAh battery.

Dual identity

Considering the Galaxy Grand and Galaxy Grand 2 are both dual-SIM (and therefore quite popular in markets such as India), it seems obvious that it'll be the same affair on the Lite. But we expect we'll see it come further West too, with a single SIM option also being mooted.

Will look... much the same, apparently (credit: SamMobile)

SamMobile states that the phone will be available from "somewhere around the fifth week of 2014" which puts it a couple of weeks before MWC. But we could also see the announcement held off until the Barcelona show.

SamMobile also states that the phone will be available in white, "Midnight Black", orange and "Lime Green". So white, black, orange and green, then.


    

In Depth: Phoning it in: how the smartphone is disrupting Hollywood
Nov 30th 2013, 13:00, by James Rogerson

In Depth: Phoning it in: how the smartphone is disrupting Hollywood

Directors and smartphones

Think of the best smartphone movies and, at best, you'll be imagining that video you once took of your drunken friends trying to push over a cow before falling into a ditch. At least it was in HD.

But you should realise that your smartphone is silently weeping, hating you for not realising the untapped potential in its high power video camera, as quality and affordability have now aligned in such a way that almost anyone can become a filmmaker.

Don't believe us? Just look at the number of smartphone film festivals that have popped up, from Festival Pocket Films in France, to the iPhone Film Festival and Mobil Film Festival in America and the Olleh International Smartphone Film Festival in South Korea. All of these and more are dedicated to films shot largely or entirely on smartphones.

And filmmakers have already found some success in the field. The first feature length smartphone film, 'SMS Sugar Man', was shot back in 2007 on a Sony Ericsson W900i and since then there have been several other full length movies and numerous shorts and music videos.

Olive

These include 'Olive', which was shot on a Nokia N8 with a 35mm zoom lens and was the first ever smartphone film to get a cinema release.

Also of note is Park Chan-wook's 'Night Fishing' short, which was shot on an iPhone 4 and won the Golden Bear for Best Short Film at the 61st Berlin International Film Festival and 'Departure', a film shot on iPhones by three different directors in three different countries.

There's clearly an appetite for using the medium of a smartphone to create a feature length piece of cinematic glory, but surely a 'proper' camera makes more sense?

Power within

It might seem weird to think that a filmmaker would choose a mobile for their movie, particularly someone established like Park Chan-wook, who's better known for his award winning revenge thriller 'Oldboy', but with the phones we have today it's not that much of a surprise.

Samsung Galaxy Note 3

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 for example can shoot 1080p video at 60fps or 2160p video at 30fps and soon more phones are likely to have 4K cameras, allowing for higher quality videos across a range of handsets.

Indeed Ruben Kazantsev, the co-founder of the iPhone Film Festival, thinks that this isn't a fad created just because the technology is there.

"Smartphone film making is here to stay," he told us emphatically. "We have been running IFF for over three years now and each year the films get better and better. So as the technology changes so will the quality of the films."

There are real advantages to shooting on a phone too. For one thing, it's a lot cheaper than conventional camera equipment, and it also opens up the medium to a gigantic number of wannabe directors as manufacturers have smuggled this high-power tech into your pocket, removing the barrier for entry.

Not only does that empower almost anyone to be a film maker, but it also makes it easier to counter equipment problems on set. Kazantsev, also a producer on the smartphone film 'Departure', highlighted an issue that only a smartphone could have solved:

"During our filming of departure we had a warehouse space for a limited time and we were down to the last scene with 20 minutes left.

"As we were getting ready to start filming I noticed my hard drive was full and had no time to download the footage to make room, since we had 20 minutes left.

"So I asked our crew 'who has an iPhone?' and almost everyone popped one out of their back pockets. If we did not have the backup cameras/smartphones we would have never gotten the last shot."

Departure

Filming on a phone also allows more risks to be taken as there's less money at stake. And because of their size and portability, smartphones can film almost anywhere, which potentially allows for shots that a traditional camera couldn't get.

A smartphone film called 'Goldilocks' included a scene where a phone was put in a ziplock bag, then placed in a glass and had wine poured on it while filming. If you're feeling a little more flush with cash, solid state microSD cards can be fitted to phones and flung around to get some truly amazing shots – you might smash the phone, but the footage will survive.

Smartphones also allow for more opportunistic filming, allowing you to capture moments that would otherwise be lost because you didn't have your video camera with you, used more often than you'd imagine in professionally produced films.

Of course there are downsides too. Susan Botello, the person behind the Mobil Film Festival, laments the lack of storage space on phones, telling us that "a phone with a great camera for video [but] low space makes it worthless."

She also argues that most phones have a horrible microphone and that the handling of low light situations needs to improve – elements which are being focused on quickly by the likes of HTC, Nokia and Apple with multiple microphones with dual membranes to improve sound quality, and massively upgraded low light sensors in cameras.

Other issues include the fact that the battery will be drained quickly when filming and ideally you'll probably still want to invest in some other equipment, such as lights, microphones and a tripod.

These issues and more mean that smartphone films haven't yet hit the mainstream. They're still fairly few and far between and the need for smartphone-specific film festivals demonstrates that they're not always comparable to more conventional films.

That isn't necessarily a bad thing. These festivals give mobile film "a platform which is a parallel to the traditional industry and open a door to film makers who use smartphones to shoot" according to Botello.

And in their very nature smartphones are going to attract independent and guerrilla film makers. Those who are unable or unwilling to work within the system and who can't afford the major expenses of a standard film.

This leads to unique projects that perhaps wouldn't be seen in mainstream cinema, such as Luke Geissbuhler's 'Space Balloon' short, which involves an iPhone being shot into space and then falling back down to earth, all while filming.

Editing a film on your phone

Shooting something is only half the battle, as you then need to edit it, but that's another thing that smartphones (and tablets) have become surprisingly adept at. For this stage of the process a tablet is preferable as it gives you a larger window to work from, but a phone can still be used.

Pinnacle Studio

Whichever you opt for there are a plethora of apps available for your video editing needs. These vary by platform of course, but for example there's Pinnacle Studio for iOS devices, which for just £6.99 lets you arrange clips, make precision edits and trims, add effects and add a soundtrack.

Then there's VidTrim Pro for Android, which costs £2.53 and has a similar selection of features. There are even a few options which cost absolutely nothing. There's a free version of VidTrim for example and a free version of Splice, which is an iOS video editor.

8mm Vintage Camera

You can even get apps to add effects to your footage or filters to your video camera. For example '8mm Vintage Camera' lets you create a retro look for only £1.49 and it was even used for some of the shots in the Oscar-winning documentary 'Searching for Sugar Man'.

Cinefy

Then there's the 'Cinefy - Special FX Studio' app, which includes over one hundred special effects and animations which can be added to your videos.

If you need a soundtrack for your film there are also numerous audio creation and editing tools available for smartphones and tablets, such as the free 'Music Maker Jam' for Android.

Music Maker Jam

Then, once you've pieced it all together you can use something like the £1.99 'Intro Designer' to add titles and credits to your movie.

Though while editing on a smartphone is certainly an option, it's not ideal. Botello said: "It isn't viable to expect an editor app on a phone to behave like one on your laptop or desktop.

"You can't compare iMovie to AVID. But just like there are apps to shoot with there are apps to edit on your phone. If you have a news story it's very viable. I can't wait for more apps to come out for editing on smartphones.

"If you are looking to make a cinematic film I urge people to, if they can, use the editor on their computer and treat the film just as any other film they were going to work with."

Kazantsev stated: "Yes but I would not recommend [editing on a smartphone]. If you are in a location where all you have is your smartphone then yes, do whatever is necessary to get the job done.

"So that is an advantage over a traditional camera, the smartphone is the only camera where you can shoot, edit and share with the world from one device."

Speaking of sharing, once you've finished editing you even have access to instant global distribution at no cost, thanks to YouTube and other video sharing sites. In fact some editing apps, such as Pinnacle Studio, even let you share your film straight to YouTube. And of course, at the end of the chain smartphones can even be used to watch your film on.

Swiss army film making

So from filming, through to editing, sharing and consuming, smartphones can handle every part of the film making process and all for little to no more money than the cost of the phone itself- which is something that many people already have. They may not be ideally suited to all parts of the process, but they manage.

Mobil Film Festival

In the future they may even excel, as technological advances will make them more viable for conventional film making. So while it might be a niche thing for now, as the cameras get better and more people embrace the potential there could be a not too distant future where smartphone films are regularly playing in a cinema near you.

When asked about whether smartphone films could compete with conventional films Botello argued that "film making began with big reels of film over a hundred years ago. Mobile film making began a few years ago. I think the advances in mobile film making are a clue that if you were going to call it a race and the phone manufacturers wanted to turn it into one, yes...why not?

"I would almost say that conventions are innovating in just about every industry around the world. Mobile technology is opening the doors to everything."


    

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

No comments:

Post a Comment