Saturday, 10 May 2014

Review TechRadar: Phone and communications news 05-10-2014

TechRadar: Phone and communications news
TechRadar UK latest feeds 
Grow your customer base.

Start a lead gen campaign on LaunchBit and cost-effectively grow your company today!
From our sponsors
In Depth: Chat changes: how phone messaging will look in the future
May 10th 2014, 14:01, by David Nield

In Depth: Chat changes: how phone messaging will look in the future

How phone messaging will look in the future

"Mr Watson, come here, I want to see you," said Alexander Graham Bell on March 10 1876 in the first telephone call. The technology pioneered by Bell was soon making it possible for anyone to hold conversations across the world in an instant.

The fixed line evolved into the mobile phone and eventually the smartphone. Today, we're not just holding instant conversations across time and space, but we're also participating in multiple chats across varied platforms, from voice to text to disappearing pictures, simultaneously.

It's what Professor Kenneth J. Gergen of Swathmore College, in his paper on cell phone technology, has termed "absent presence": we might be physically in a room, but our attention is elsewhere, and it's being divided into smaller and smaller chunks.

As this technological upheaval continues, how will our inability to concentrate on one task impact the way we communicate with each other over the next 10-20 years?

Is face-to-face communication set to become rarer and rarer in the decades ahead? We've asked some of the experts in the field on whether we can expect radical changes in the way we gain and hold the attention of another human being.

Layered communication

Scott Campbell is the Associate Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Michigan, specialising in the study of how mobile communication affects both public and private life. He sees different types of relationships appearing as mobile technology evolves:

"I think we are experiencing a trend toward increased 'layered' communication, with technology being used to manage multiple flows of information and communication at once.

"Sometimes this can detract from the quality of our face-to-face communication, but it can also enhance it - like when someone far away is integrated into a co-present group of individuals - for example, when grandma Skypes in to experience her grandson blowing out his birthday candles."

Google Glass

Even in 2014, there's a need to manage close, one-on-one relationships (your partner, family members, etc) with weaker, virtual ones (e.g. Twitter followers), and Campbell thinks technology will adapt to help us out rather than render us dumb receptacles to an endless stream of social media.

"In the future, I think we will see this 'layering' become more seamless and integrated into our communication experiences," he says.

"An example of movement in this direction is head-mounted interfaces, like Google Glass. These types of innovations keep the eyes more centralised, so that it's less like engaging in two different social worlds in terms of a screen we look down to and our physical environment."

Invisible technology

This idea of technology getting out of the way is echoed by Jonathan MacDonald, a respected speaker and adviser on technology's impact on society and business.

Having worked with the likes of Google and Apple in the past, MacDonald told TechRadar what he sees coming down the line in terms of the way the humble message will shift from the screen to an altogether more intimate experience: "Exponential growth indicates that by 2030 the average size of a computer chip will be the size of a blood cell and around one billion times more capable than today.

"Due to this, it isn't too far fetched to imagine the ability to communicate via emotion without an intermediary device. It is highly likely that much of the communication machinery will live under our skin. Literally.

"I think the way we interact in the future will not be a technological thing but a human thing," continues MacDonald. "Technology is becoming invisible and eventually that will leave sentiment and message.

"Whatever modern technology there is today that has physical form has, in my opinion, a questionable future."

Motion

We're already seeing the growth of voice-based and gesture-based controls - look at Apple's recent purchase of Kinect company PrimeSense - and we're also seeing a unification of services such as Skype and Google Hangouts across multiple devices.

If the technology we use to communicate fades into the background, this could be good news for single, one-on-one interactions rather than dozens of fleeting ones across multiple social media accounts.

Like Campbell, MacDonald doesn't think that face-to-face communications are necessarily under threat either, highlighting the fact that interaction is unlikely to become more and more virtual with every passing year: "I believe that if we move towards a more augmented and virtual reality it may come to pass that we value real human interactions at a higher value than we do now," he adds.

Florie Brizel, an author, consultant and researcher who has been studying mobile technology and communication since 2003, takes a slightly different view. She believes the nature of our relationships may be under threat, but that there is hope for the future.

"I think the pendulum will continue to swing away from face-to-face for a while," Brizel told us. "Eventually, people will stop looking at their devices and return to face-to-face communication... but why we look to each other may change.

"If we lose the ability to interact and find comfort with face-to-face communication then I think we will have lost an inherent part of our humanity."

Putting in the FaceTime

As anyone who has sat around a table or bar will testify, real-world one-on-one relationships suffer if there are mobiles in the room.

Science agrees: a 2013 study from Andrew K. Przybylski and Netta Weinstein at the University of Essex found that weaker connections were made if a cell phone was nearby, even if it was switched off and out of reach, meaning that our bond with the mobile phone, be it the nervousness of missing an email or wanting to stay in touch with an online conversation, is having a dramatic impact on the richness of our current communications.

However, this research involved pairs of strangers meeting for the first time. In a 2010 experiment carried out by the aforementioned Scott Campbell and his colleague Nojin Kwak, the results suggested that spending more time on the phone with someone leads to more face-to-face time with the same person.

Could it be that browsing your friend's Facebook page gives you more to talk about when you next meet, or makes you more eager to meet in the first place?

Facetime

"It's difficult to forecast, but based on recent and historical trends, I think it's safe to say that face-to-face will remain an important part of how people interact," says Campbell.

"So far, most of the evidence suggests that online and mobile channels are not taking away from face-to-face interaction, but complementing it. In some cases, especially with mobile, technology fuels face-to-face interaction when used to coordinate meet-ups."

Talk to the animals

If technological advances can help us communicate with each other more efficiently, will we even be able to talk to animals in the future thanks to technology?

Professor Con Slobodchikoff is an animal behaviourist and conservation biologist currently on the staff of the University of Arizona. He has carried out extensive research on animal communications and written a book on the topic — Chasing Doctor Dolittle: Learning the Language of Animals.

Slobodchikoff told us: "A number of animals have languages that they can use in ways that are similar to our language — the challenge is learning how to decode those languages.

"That involves building a dictionary of animal language words that are used in different contexts... once we know what the words mean, we already have the tools to begin to communicate with animals."

Professor Slobodchikoff's animal communication technology has appeared on the BBC.

Slobodchikoff and his computer scientist colleague John Placer have already developed synthesizing software that can warn prairie dogs about nearby predators, built from an extensive set of data collected from the pair's monitoring equipment. In 10 or 20 years, this kind of equipment will have improved dramatically.

It therefore makes sense that if such a database can be developed, we could have technology within our bodies that would be able to translate an animal sound in real life conversation - although holding the conversation might be somewhat trickier.

So prepare yourself for this inevitable future: invisible technology inside you that gets out of the way and makes face-to-face communication possible wherever and whenever, and you might even be able to Skype your cat as easily as your grandmother.

If our experts are right, new technologies will augment physical one-on-one communication, rather than create replacements for it.

In the face of an increasing number of weak, virtual connections, the close relationship might be heading for a comeback.








In depth: Why you still can't pay with your smartphone to travel the tube
May 10th 2014, 12:01, by John McCann

In depth: Why you still can't pay with your smartphone to travel the tube

Using a paper ticket on public transport is so last century. With the introduction of the Oyster card, and more recently NFC-enabled bank cards, our ways of paying for travel are fast becoming contactless.

In fact over 85% of travellers on Transport for London's (TfL) services use an Oyster card, so we're already a society which is used to ditching the traditional ticket.

You can already use your phone to pay in the likes of McDonalds and Pret - there are over 300,000 stores now offering the technology - but the transport firms are lagging behind.

But we've been asking the same question for years: if NFC-enabled phones can be used for payments, why are they not now commonplace for use on our contactless-ready transport network?

Cities in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong already support contactless mobile payments for metro, rail, bus, ferry, coach and tram journeys, and these transport networks are actually busier than London's.

This follows on from the slow-to-market 4G network that only really got going towards the end of 2013, and with the country's busiest city not yet on board with contactless mobile payments we're left wondering what the hold up is.

Popularity surrounding contactless payments is on the rise, with Visa telling us that contactless purchases grew to 94.3 million in the UK in 2013 and cards carrying the technology increased in number by 125% in the same period, so the necessary elements are quickly becoming commonplace.

Technical physicality

TfL hasn't just woken up to contactless technology though, it's actually been working on it for a while, and it appears the hold-up is with those providing the payments, rather than the technology.

"TfL has been working hard to introduce contactless for a few years, which has required us to work with the card payments industry to develop a new transaction model specifically for the transit environment which hasn't been simple," a TfL spokesperson revealed.

Shashi Verma, TfL's Director of Customer Experience told us that the recent work on the network has made contactless mobile payments technically possible, and it's "continuing to modernise our transport services and make it easier for customers to do business with us."

While mobile phone payments may now be technically possible, it hasn't been physically implemented just yet. Even the NFC-enabled bank cards are only working on buses for now, but the functionality will be extended to the tube later this year.

There are concerns about the speed of transactions via mobile payments which is putting a spanner in the works of its implementation on TfL services.

"Customers expect TfL's fare collection system to be easy to use," Verma told us. "With the intensity of London's transport services it is essential that the fare collection system does not cause congestion at gates and when boarding buses.

"The speed with which a card can be read is critical to ensuring this capacity. If mobile phones with contactless applications can achieve similar transaction speeds we would welcome their use on our system."

So with upgrades coming online that should see London match its international rivals, the path should be clear for using smartphones to navigate the capital soon.

Much safer than cash

As well as transaction speed, there are also concerns surrounding the security aspect of contactless which puts some people off trying the service - although once you've tried it you're likely to use it again.

The Visa spokesperson said "Our research tells us that consumers love contactless technologies once they have the chance to try them."

That love for contactless can easily be extended if it comes to our public transport networks, as it will make it available to a huge number of people on a daily basis - at least twice a day with the commute to and from work.

The convenience of not having to remember an Oyster card or train ticket as well as your phone, keys, wallet or purse and bag in the early morning rush is surely a benefit as well, as well as helping avoid 'card clash' where you can accidentally pay with a credit and Oyster card simultaneously if both are in your wallet placed on the reader.

It's not just the convenience of tapping to pay either, it's also one of the most secure ways to make a purchase.

"When you use contactless, you begin to understand that when you use the technology, there are so many layers of security that it's as safe as using any bank card, and much safer than using cash," added the Visa spokesperson.

The future is mobile

But despite the current issues with technology, the future is still apparently going to see smartphones come to the fore as a primary method of payment in the future as we become more comfortable with mobile spending.

"Mobile payments, including mobile contactless, will sit at the heart of how people pay in the future," the Visa spokesperson explained.

"The success of payments innovation, however, will not depend on the success of a particular piece of hardware or software. It will depend on the convenience and security of the payments system that supports it."

So where does this leave us in the UK?

"In principle, mobile phones with a Visa, Mastercard or AMEX payment application could be accepted on TfL services," Verma told us.

"We are testing to see how the devices perform on the system and welcome any innovations which improve the services and choices we are able to offer customers."

TfL now has its house in order and it's up to the rest of the industry to fall into line. "We've done the pioneering work and upgraded all of our readers, so now it is a matter for the mobile payments industry to bring products for their, and our, customers to use," Verma added.








You can now reset your Twitter password with a text
May 9th 2014, 18:00, by Michael Rougeau

You can now reset your Twitter password with a text

Twitter has added a couple of new security features that should make it easier for users to reset their passwords when necessary and keep their accounts secure.

Firstly Twitter users can now verify their mobile numbers with the social network and choose to use SMS when receiving a password reset code.

The six-digit code is sent to their phones in a text message rather than to their email accounts, in case a user's email has been compromised in some way (like if you use the same password on multiple sites).

The code expires in 15 minutes, after which they'll have to request a new one.

Stop right there

Meanwhile Twitter has also promised to be more diligent when it comes to suspicious log-in activity.

Twitter will take into account factors like device used, location of said device, and log-in history to determine whether to ask the person attempting to log in to verify his or her identity.

Twitter users will also receive an email notifying them of any suspicious activity the social network detects.

"Whether you've recently changed your phone number, or are traveling with limited access to your devices, or had an old email address connected to your Twitter account, you've got options," Twitter Product Manager Mollie Vandor wrote in a blog post.

She continued: "Your Twitter account is important to you, and your account security is important to us. We will continue to work on bolstering Twitter account security so you can keep enjoying Twitter safely."








Sprint throttling speeds for its heaviest unlimited data users next month
May 8th 2014, 18:17, by Kevin Lee

Sprint throttling speeds for its heaviest unlimited data users next month

Sprint just put a sour note on its unlimited data service as the carrier announced it would begin throttling data speeds for its heaviest users.

Fierce Wireless reports that Sprint, as well as its prepaid brands, Virgin and Boost Mobile will begin throttling its heaviest data users starting June 1. Supposedly the operators have been sending out notifications to customers informing them of a new data management measure they will employ soon.

In a newly updated Sprint FAQ page, the yellow carrier specifies that "congestion management" will bump down mobile speeds for any of its customers that fall within its top 5% of data users.

Sprint does not clearly specify exactly how much data usage will land users in this top five percentile. However, the company writes that anyone using 5GB or more will likely fall into this category.

The endless feast

Although Sprint has been beating its chest as one of the last defenders of unlimited data - while mocking other carriers for implementing data caps and throttling speeds - the carrier says it's a necessity to maintain a fair user experience for everyone.

The carrier paints this new restriction as a necessity to fairly allocate resources for times when network bandwidth isn't infinite and times of network congestion. Corporate spin aside, Sprint has slowly been changing its tune surrounding unlimited data.

Earlier in March Sprints two MVNO's, Virgin and Boost Mobile, began reducing users who overstepped their 2.5GB allotment of high-speed data down to 2G speeds. It was only a matter of time before Sprint began implementing some form of throttling with its own service.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

No comments:

Post a Comment